Connect with us

Social Justice

Never Unarmed: When Your Skin Color Is A Deadly Weapon

Being unarmed doesn’t make you a threat…your skin color does. For Black people sometimes your skin color is a deadly weapon.

Khalil A Cumberbatch

Published

on

Never Unarmed: When Your Skin Color Is A Deadly Weapon

I’m an optimist by nature. That’s tough for a man of color to achieve in NYC, but I would say I fair pretty well. But every now and again I’ll see or hear something that just pulls the pessimist right out of me.

That is what happened on the morning of Friday, November 21, 2014 when I turned on the news and saw another unarmed black man was killed by the NYPD.

When Your Skin Color Is A Deadly Weapon

Akai Gurley

Akai Gurley was walking with his girlfriend down the stairwell of the Louis H. Pink housing complex in Brooklyn, NY, when probationary Officer Peter Liang “nervously” shot him with a single shot to the chest.

News reports expeditiously regurgitated the police reports that the bullet ricocheted off a wall and hit Akai in his chest, implying Liang did not directly shoot Akai.

However, Akai’s girlfriend Melissa Butler, is quoted as saying “They didn’t give no explanation. They didn’t identify themselves. No nothing. They just pulled a gun and shot him in the chest.”

Butler also confirms what the NYPD said, which is that Akai was unarmed and presented no immediate threat to the Liang. Yet, Akai was shot and killed.

Akai’s murder speaks to the level of paranoia and fear police departments across the nation feel when it comes to young men of color. Even being unarmed is not sufficient to become a victim of what is equivalent to reckless homicide.

See also  Singer Heidi Burson captivates audiences through human experience

A valid question is, if Officer Liang were performing vertical patrols in an apartment complex on 59th street and 2nd avenue in pricey mid-town Manhattan, would there be in his subconscious, and maybe in his conscious, a heightened level of paranoia?

I believe there would not be. Why? Because policing tactics such as vertical patrols don’t exist in midtown Manhattan. Programs such as Operation Clean Halls and Stop-and-frisk do not exist in neighborhoods such as Chelsea, Cobble Hill, Millburn, Essex Fells, etc.

These programs, and more importantly, the paranoid belief of police officers that everyone is a threat, even unarmed young men of color, is only applicable in neighborhoods such as East New York, Brooklyn; Oakland, California; Baltimore Maryland; Newark, New Jersey; Ferguson, Missouri; etc. Officer Liang is the most recent published perpetrator of this mentality.

 

Khalil Gibran Muhammad speaks to this in his book “The Condemnation of Blackness”. He explains there has been, and continues to be, a condemnation of men of color, specifically Black men.

Mr. Muhammad displays the efforts of the academic, medical, law enforcement, and political professions to create, associate and perpetuate a belief amongst whites as well as people of color, that the black male is inherently evil, bad and devoid of any rights based solely on their physical demeanor, biological make-up and overall existence.

This mentality continues to rear its ugly head in current times, as is the case with Akai. What was Officer Liang so afraid of?

I would argue he was afraid of Akai’s skin color and was taught to believe Akai was a threat predicated solely on this fact.

Mistrust in police

I’ve worked with young men of color, and one item is made clear from them – there is a profound level of mistrust towards any form of police enforcement.

Some may respond to this statement and say those young men have a reason to mistrust the police because they are involved in illegal activity.

However, the reality is this distrust exists because of the history of seeing their counterparts slain and, worst yet, there being no substantial repercussions for the individuals or the systemic issues that allow these individuals to operate in a vacuum. The blame here does not lie with Officer Liang solely.

The real blame comes with the history of criminalizing people of color and how the NYPD continues to perpetuate that history by misleading and misinforming probationary officers such as Liang.

What did he have to fear so much that made him nervous to the point he needed to enforce the use of a firearm?

 

So there are some tough but valid questions that need to be asked and ultimately answered. How does one cope with the perception that your skin color makes you a threat?

Should we have to cope with that? How do we, as those who “oppose” unjustified shootings of unarmed black males, perpetuate this ideology?

When we see a group of young men of color, how does it make you feel? The real fight does not end with the indictment of officers when they kill our young men.

See also  Unarmed man fatally shot by Minnesota Police

The real fight has to be to bring true justice to an unjust system as well as to challenge and reinvent the idea young men of color are inherently a threat, as does this video.

Most importantly, we have to be bold and shameless to change the mentality of others. That is the most impactful way, from my perspective, to honor our fallen men.

When Your Skin Color Is A Deadly Weapon


----------------------------------------------------------
Connect with Unheard Voices on Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube

Download the app on Google Play or ITunes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unheard Voices Magazine is a news reporting platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Politics

Lil Scrappy, Big Freedia, Mia X, Cookie Nasty, and more artists partner with Hip Hop Caucus for a Political Rap Cypher

Released just under one week before the most important presidential election of our time, these rappers focused on issue advocacy and dropped powerful bars on the importance of voting, voting rights and democracy, civil rights, economic justice, and environmental justice – all issues that affect people of color the most and some of the pressing issues and deciding factors in this year’s election.

Unheard Voices Magazine

Published

on

Hip hop political Cypher
Photo Source: Hip-Hop Caucus

Some of hip hop’s most influential voices, Lil Scrappy, Big Freedia Mia X, Lee Merritt, Cookie Nasty, and Trae Crockett have joined musical forces to partner with Hip Hop Caucus to release a powerful political cypher as a final push to encourage people to head to polls and vote.

Hip Hop political cypher

Released just under one week before the most important presidential election of our time, these rappers focused on issue advocacy and dropped powerful bars on the importance of voting, voting rights and democracy, civil rights, economic justice, and environmental justice – all issues that affect people of color the most and some of the pressing issues and deciding factors in this year’s election.

The power of voting

Hip Hop Caucus is no stranger to leveraging the power of music, celebrity, and activism, launching their Respect My Vote! Campaign and Tour earlier this year, which included activists to reach and educate communities of color about political and social issues, and mobilize people to vote for the change they want to see on November 5.

Subscribe to UVM

* indicates required

Intuit Mailchimp

The message is clear that we cannot afford not to cast our ballots this election, with Mia X stating, “Say it with my chest, imma step for my rights, 10 toes down …my choice, my freedoms my voice, my votes and “if you don’t vote you don’t matter”.

See also  We’re fighting systems, NOT people

Watch the cypher

 


----------------------------------------------------------
Connect with Unheard Voices on Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube

Download the app on Google Play or ITunes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unheard Voices Magazine is a news reporting platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Continue Reading

Health & Wellness

Amber Nicole Thurman died from delayed care due to Georgia’s abortion laws, says family

Thurman died after waiting 20 hours in pain for a hospital to treat a rare complication from taking an abortion pill, she had to obtain in North Carolina.

Unheard Voices Magazine

Published

on

Amber Nicole Thurman
Amber Nicole Thurman (Photo Source: GoFundMe)

Amber Nicole Thurman was a vibrant, healthy 28-year-old Georgia woman who tragically died due to abortion laws and medical neglect, her family says.

Amber Nicole Thurman’s life could have been preventable

According to reports, Thurman died after waiting 20 hours in pain for a hospital to treat a rare complication from taking an abortion pill that she had to obtain in North Carolina. She needed a routine procedure, a dilation and curettage (D&C), to clear residual tissue from her uterus.

Did abortion laws cause problems for the mother?

But she reportedly couldn’t get the help she needed. New abortion laws in Georgia made conducting this essential medical procedure a felony unless in an emergency situation.

Georgia’s LIFE Act took effect after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade in 2022 and banned abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected, effectively prohibiting abortions beyond around six weeks of pregnancy, and criminalized performing one with limited exceptions.

Thurman had sought help at a local hospital in Stockbridge, Georgia. Even as Thurman developed sepsis, her family says doctors at the hospital did not evacuate the remaining fetal tissue in her uterus with the (D&C). Unfortunately, she later died on the operating table, reports ProPublica.

After Thurman’s death, a Fulton County Superior Court judge struck down the law, stating the law violates Georgia’s Constitution, reports NewsWeek.

ProPublica reported that Georgia’s maternal mortality committee also found that Thurman’s death was completely preventable. When her family learned this, they were devastated once again and their grief intensified affirming that Amber should not have died.

GoFundMe

As Thurman’s family struggles to cope with their grief and anger, they are striving to care for Amber’s son the way she wanted and have started a GoFundMe.

“The funds through this site will support Amber’s son for his immediate needs and for his future. This includes mental health and grief counseling for him and Amber’s family,” the GoFundMe reads.

According to the family, the funds will also support the family’s fight for justice for Amber and women’s rights over their own bodies.

“Amber was a devoted mother to her 6-year-old son and had dreams of becoming a nurse while she worked as a medical assistant. Amber hoped to provide a bright future for herself and her son, but that was stolen from her, and we cannot stand by as this happens to more women.”

Visit the GoFundMe to donate and for more information.


----------------------------------------------------------
Connect with Unheard Voices on Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube

Download the app on Google Play or ITunes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unheard Voices Magazine is a news reporting platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Continue Reading

Social Justice

Exonerated ‘Central Park Five’ sue Trump for defamation after debate comments

The lawsuit stems from Trump’s remarks during the presidential debate last month.

Unheard Voices Magazine

Published

on

Exonerated Five Trump lawsuit
Photo Source: BET Networks YouTube Creative commons license (https://youtu.be/1UF0LPJU-FM?si=PGm-NKtWqJuU2YHN)

The five men from the infamous Central Park case who call themselves the Exonerated Five have filed a defamation lawsuit against Donald Trump.

The lawsuit stems from his remarks during the presidential debate last month.

Exonerated Five lawsuit against Donald Trump

During the Sept. 10 debate in Pennsylvania, Trump said the five men, Antron McCray, Kevin Richardson, Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana and Korey Wise, pleaded guilty when they were tried in connection with the assault and rape of a woman who had been running in Central Park on April 19, 1989, and that the victim had died.

During the debate he said: “They admitted, they said, they pled guilty. And I said, well, if they pled guilty they badly hurt a person, killed a person ultimately. And if they pled guilty, then they pled we’re not guilty.”

At the time of the trials, each men had actually pleaded not guilty, and the victim of the attack survived.

According to the complaint, Trump’s statements are “demonstrably false,” adding that “Plaintiffs never pled guilty to any crime and were subsequently cleared of all wrongdoing. Further the victims of the Central Park assaults were not killed.”

The complaint further added that the men, now in their 50s, have “suffered injuries as a result of Defendant Trump’s false and defamatory statements.”

Falsely accused

The Exonerated Five, who were just teenagers when they were indicted, had always maintained their innocence throughout their separate trials and incarceration.

Each were charged with the assault of the female jogger, as well as other assaults and robberies in Central Park.

They five spent years in prison before they were exonerated in 2002 after DNA evidence linked another man, a serial rapist, to the crime. The city agreed in a legal settlement to pay the exonerated men $41 million.

This happened during a time of heightened racial tensions coupled with the case dominating headlines. Trump, then a real estate mogul, had taken out large ads in newspapers referencing the case calling for New York to bring back the death penalty.

The defamation suit was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The complaint noted that Salaam, a New York City Council member representing District 9, was at the debate and in the room when Trump made the statements.

In the lawsuit the men did not specify damages and asked for a trial to determine the amount.


----------------------------------------------------------
Connect with Unheard Voices on Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube

Download the app on Google Play or ITunes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unheard Voices Magazine is a news reporting platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Tags

Archives

unheard voices shop
unheard voices on google play unheard voices on itunes

Trending