Connect with us

Social Justice

Felon voting ban in North Carolina is racially motivated and unconstitutional, judges rule

A panel of three superior court judges in Wake County, NC ruled in a 2-1 decision that people with criminal records can vote once they have rejoined society and are no longer behind bars.

Unheard Voices Magazine

Published

on

Felon voting ban in North Carolina is racially motivated and unconstitutional, judges rule
Photo by Edmond Dantès from Pexels: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-man-dropping-a-paper-in-a-box-7103206/

North Carolina’s felon voting ban law barring many people with felony records from voting after they get out of prison is now deemed unconstitutional, a state court ruled Monday.

Felon voting ban law is unconstitutional

A panel of three superior court judges in Wake County, NC ruled in a 2-1 decision that people with criminal records can vote once they have rejoined society and are no longer behind bars.

The judges wrote that “if a person otherwise eligible to vote is not in jail or prison for a felony conviction, they may lawfully register and vote in North Carolina.”

The state law previously allowed people with felony convictions to vote only once they finish their sentence. Not only including their prison sentence but also any probation or parole, which sometimes can last for years after someone is released from prison.

Disenfranchisement

The judges found the felon voting ban law unconstitutional for generally violating people’s rights, but also for being explicitly targeted towards Black people.

Specifically, they wrote that the law “was enacted with the intent of discriminating against African American people and has a demonstrably disproportionate and discriminatory impact.”

Community Success Initiative sued the state in 2019 to strike down the state law. Lawyers for the initiative argued that keeping people from voting upon release from prison violated the state Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and Free Elections Clause, and that the law was written in the 1970s with a racist intentions.

“This landmark decision is the largest expansion of voting rights in NC since the Voting Rights Act of 1965,” Daryl Atkinson, lead attorney in the case, told The News & Observer.

Don't miss out!
Subscribe To Newsletter

Receive the latest in news, music, and issues that matter. 

Invalid email address
Give it a try. You can unsubscribe at any time. We will never spam your inbox.

Plaintiffs noted serious disenfranchisement with the law, disproportionately affected Black residents, which account for 21% of the state’s voting age population and 42% of those denied the right to vote because of the law.

See also  Marissa Alexander : Stood Her Ground, Now Faces Up to 25 Years in Prison

“In total, 1.24% of the entire African American voting-age population in North Carolina are denied the franchise due to felony probation, parole, or post- release supervision, whereas only 0.45% of the White voting-age population are denied the franchise,” according to Monday’s ruling.

Republican lawmakers who defended the case argued there is no racial disparity in the law because “100% of felons of every race in North Carolina” were banned from voting until they completed probation or parole, but the court majority dismissed the argument.

Ultimately, the court found that “when the General Assembly prescribes by law the manner in which a convicted felon’s right to vote is restored, it must do so on equal terms and in a manner that ensures elections ascertain the will of the people.”

News & Observer reported that around 55,000 people will be affected by the law being overturned.

Photo by Edmond Dantès: https://www.pexels.com/photo/a-man-dropping-a-paper-in-a-box-7103206/


----------------------------------------------------------
Connect with Unheard Voices on Twitter, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube

Download the app on Google Play or ITunes.
----------------------------------------------------------
Unheard Voices Magazine is a news reporting platform covered under Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.

Unheard Voices is an award-winning news magazine that started in 2004 as a local Black newsletter in the Asbury Park, Neptune, and Long Branch, NJ areas to now broaden into a recognized Black online media outlet. They are the recipient of the NAACP Unsung Hero Award and CV Magazine's Innovator Award for Best Social Justice Communications Company.

Facebook

Tags

Archives

unheard voices shop
unheard voices on google play unheard voices on itunes

Trending