Diddy convicted under the Mann Act: A Century-Old Law at the Center of a Modern Scandal

Music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs was convicted on July 2, 2025, of two felony counts under the Mann Act, a law originally passed in 1910 to combat human trafficking.

While he was acquitted of the more severe charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, the guilty verdict on the Mann Act violations could still carry a sentence of up to 20 years in prison.

What Is the Mann Act?

The Mann Act, also known as the White-Slave Traffic Act, criminalizes the transportation of individuals across state lines for “prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.”

Though originally rooted in early 20th-century moral panic, the law has evolved over time. A 1986 amendment made it gender-neutral and narrowed its scope to focus on criminal sexual conduct rather than vague “immoral purposes”.

How The Mann Act Ties to Diddy’s Case

Prosecutors argued that Combs used his wealth and influence to transport women across state lines for paid sexual encounters, including orchestrated events referred to as “freak-offs.”

The two counts stemmed from incidents involving his ex-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and another woman known only as “Jane.” Both testified that Combs coerced them into participating in drug-fueled sex marathons with male escorts, often under threat of violence or blackmail.

Despite being cleared of sex trafficking and racketeering, the jury found that Combs had violated the Mann Act by arranging and funding interstate travel for these encounters.

Legal and Cultural Implications

The verdict has reignited debate over the Mann Act’s controversial history. Once used to target interracial couples and enforce moral codes, the law has also been applied in modern cases involving R. Kelly and Ghislaine Maxwell. Critics argue that its legacy is racially charged, while supporters see it as a vital tool against coercive sexual exploitation.

Sentencing is expected later this year, with the court weighing whether the two counts will run concurrently or consecutively.